Elsewhere on the Internet today
- Born-Confused
- Expatriate
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 9:29 am
- Reputation: 68
Re: Elsewhere on the Internet today
Yep - but that means you're stooping to their level, and hence not making this forum your own.OrangeDragon wrote: By and large that's what we're trying to do, however certain things they're doing DO deserve some attention... and even the "oh oh look, they are now talking about morning teas" was in response to their criticism of us and our "stats" (while they were attacking two of our advertisers no less)... which laughable to even suggest comparing considering that our forum is only like 2 weeks old while wayback theirs has been around for over a decade.
Granted, I've got worked up over certain non-issues and idiotic posters, must be time for a drink
Re: Elsewhere on the Internet today
Oh, don't be a drama queen. He didn't "literally allege" you were into kiddie porn, he just reiterated that you had communicated by PM with the child porn spammer he was tracking, probably in response to you repeatedly harping on the fact he had read that PM. He previously disclosed to everyone that your PM exchange with the guy was on another topic entirely, standing in for the guy's fake wedding. You complained when he revealed the content of that PM, and rightfully so, but now you complain when he mentions your PM communication with the spammer without explaining the content. If your point is that he never should have mentioned your PM with the porn spammer, that's fair, but it's not fair to say that he "literally alleged" you were into kiddie porn.OrangeDragon wrote:born-confused... you do realize it's less about what they did, and more about what they're currently doing right?
i mean the admin of that forum literally alleged i was into kiddie porn to his members the other day until gavin came and cleared it up... that's a little over the top. not to mention his continuing twitter bashing and targeting/badmouthing of our advertisers...
I agree with you though that gavinmac is a top bloke for clearing it up.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4193
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 8:05 pm
- Reputation: 17
Re: Elsewhere on the Internet today
gavin certainly is, though if it wasn't him alleging it then why did gavin have to clear it up in the first place?
Re: Elsewhere on the Internet today
I think that CAM NIVAG has it wrong. This gavinmac guy is a real bastard
from what I have read on that other forum.
from what I have read on that other forum.
- JBTrain
- Expatriate
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 3:44 pm
- Reputation: 98
- Location: Phnom Penh
- Contact:
Re: Elsewhere on the Internet today
This forum may have a shot if/when y'all can stop behaving like five year old girls and find something to say beyond what's wrong with 440. I'll hang in but this is already getting very old.
No offense to five year old girls.
No offense to five year old girls.
Last edited by JBTrain on Wed May 28, 2014 7:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
Using Tapatalk
- vladimir
- The Pun-isher
- Posts: 6077
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 6:51 pm
- Reputation: 185
- Location: The Kremlin
Re: Elsewhere on the Internet today
Agree, he could have kept quiet and he stuck his neck out. He can be impartial, like a mod is supposed to be. Definitely a better mod than a few...Cam Nivag wrote:I agree with you though that gavinmac is a top bloke for clearing it up.
I sometimes wonder if he's really a lawyer...
Jesus loves you...Mexico is great, right?
Re: Elsewhere on the Internet today
This. And they're really immature five year olds.JBTrain wrote:This forum may have a shot if/when y'all can stop behaving like five year old girls and find something to say beyond what's wrong with 440. I'll hang in but this is already getting very old.
No offense to five year old girls.
Re: Elsewhere on the Internet today
It's an established red top / tabloid newspaper tactic though,isn't it - use a punchy headline or pun to create an impression even if the following story doesn't actually substantiate or refer back to the original statement.
Don't know if this was the intention and don't know KIR beyond reading his rather pungent ramblings in the other place but I recall taking a sharp intake of breath on first reading...not sure I'd be the only browser who would have been left with an indelibly bad impression though did go back and review the whole post again...but maybe not everyone bothered.
Don't know if this was the intention and don't know KIR beyond reading his rather pungent ramblings in the other place but I recall taking a sharp intake of breath on first reading...not sure I'd be the only browser who would have been left with an indelibly bad impression though did go back and review the whole post again...but maybe not everyone bothered.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 61 Replies
- 15092 Views
-
Last post by Arget
-
- 9 Replies
- 4280 Views
-
Last post by Doc67
-
- 26 Replies
- 4783 Views
-
Last post by Doc67
-
- 6 Replies
- 4143 Views
-
Last post by DavidFieldman
-
- 7 Replies
- 3023 Views
-
Last post by sigmoid
-
- 4 Replies
- 2469 Views
-
Last post by SternAAlbifrons
-
- 11 Replies
- 2230 Views
-
Last post by mannanman
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Alex, angsta, armchairlawyer, barang_TK, Bluenose, Clutch Cargo, drozd, Freightdog, Google [Bot], Ingvar 7788, Kammekor, khmerhamster, lurcio, Majestic-12 [Bot], orussey98, WildAlaskaKen, yongchi and 707 guests