Is Drug Taking a Natural Imperative?

This is where our community discusses almost anything! While we're mainly a Cambodia expat discussion forum and talk about expat life here, we debate about almost everything. Even if you're a tourist passing through Southeast Asia and want to connect with expatriates living and working in Cambodia, this is the first section of our site that you should check out. Our members start their own discussions or post links to other blogs and/or news articles they find interesting and want to chat about. So join in the fun and start new topics, or feel free to comment on anything our community members have already started! We also have some Khmer members here as well, but English is the main language used on CEO. You're welcome to have a look around, and if you decide you want to participate, you can become a part our international expat community by signing up for a free account.
potty
Expatriate
Posts: 1284
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: Is Drug Taking a Natural Imperative?

Post by potty »

yes, a compensation for some "physical deficits" ppl have. imo.

what do you think?

that everyone is a gambler by nature, and only "free will" stops us to gamble the house at the casino ?
Milord
Expatriate
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 6:14 am
Reputation: 3
Location: Soon, Soon There
Canada

Re: Is Drug Taking a Natural Imperative?

Post by Milord »

Why animals eat psychoactive plants

Johann Hari, author of Chasing the Scream: The First and Last Days of the War on Drugs, learns about drunk elephants, the stoned water buffalo, and the grieving mongoose.

BY JOHANN HARI

The United Nations says the drug war’s rationale is to build “a drug-free world — we can do it!” U.S. government officials agree, stressing that “there is no such thing as recreational drug use.” So this isn’t a war to stop addiction, like that in my family, or teenage drug use. It is a war to stop drug use among all humans, everywhere. All these prohibited chemicals need to be rounded up and removed from the earth. That is what we are fighting for.

I began to see this goal differently after I learned the story of the drunk elephants, the stoned water buffalo, and the grieving mongoose. They were all taught to me by a remarkable scientist in Los Angeles named Professor Ronald K. Siegel.

***
The tropical storm in Hawaii had reduced the mongoose’s home to a mess of mud, and lying there, amid the dirt and the water, was the mongoose’s mate — dead. Professor Siegel, a silver-haired official adviser to two U.S. presidents and to the World Health Organization, was watching this scene. The mongoose found the corpse, and it made a decision: it wanted to get out of its mind.

Two months before, the professor had planted a powerful hallucinogen called silver morning glory in the pen. The mongooses had all tried it, but they didn’t seem to like it: they stumbled around disoriented for a few hours and had stayed away from it ever since. But not now. Stricken with grief, the mongoose began to chew. Before long, it had tuned in and dropped out.

It turns out this wasn’t a freak occurrence in the animal kingdom. It is routine. As a young scientific researcher, Siegel had been confidently toldby his supervisor that humans were the only species that seek out drugs to use for their own pleasure. But Siegel had seen cats lunging at catnip — which, he knew, contains chemicals that mimic the pheromones in a male tomcat’s pee —so, he wondered, could his supervisor really be right? Given the number of species in the world, aren’t there others who want to get high, or stoned, or drunk?

[Interesting bit:]
In Vietnam, the water buffalo have always shunned the local opium plants. They don’t like them. But when the American bombs started to fall all around them during the war, the buffalo left their normal grazing grounds, broke into the opium fields, and began to chew. They would then look a little dizzy and dulled. When they were traumatized, it seems, they wanted — like the mongoose, like us — to escape from their thoughts.
cont ...

http://boingboing.net/2015/01/20/why-an ... ive-p.html

Comments from article:
kamakiri

I've been reading an account of the Manhattan Project. It's not news to me; I've been well acquainted with the story of the making of the atomic bomb and all its intricacies for many years now. Still, I like to seek out different points of view of the same historical events -- no two are the same. In this case, the story doesn't focus on the atomic bomb really, at all. Instead, it focuses on the people who came, and dwelled, at Los Alamos, from a social perspective; like, the constant parties thrown all over the base for sheer relief from the unrelenting pressures. The fact that most of the scientists were actually prevented (and followed the rules) of telling their own wives what they were doing.

This is not new news. But what strikes me here is just how many, and much, scientists, all the way to Robert Oppenheimer, were pretty much fucked out of their skulls on most weekend nights. They would put modern partying to shame; "Oppie" was "renowned" for his martinis. I am assuming that these martinis, in addition to the lab alcohol -- 200-proof, and I am not making that up -- were handed out like candy. And consumed like candy. The hangovers on Sundays were all part of the jollity; in those days, it was "hair of the dog" rather than recriminations on "how fucked up you were last night and what hateful remarks you said to that woman" blah blah blah.

Need I remind anyone that these people constructed a nuclear fission weapon within the space of zero to 28 months? On a project that at one time supposedly consumed ten percent of ALL THE ELECTRICITY USED BY THE UNITED STATES? One that, if conducted today, would cost in excess of $40 billion?

And most -- at least a lot -- were fucked up beyond belief a lot of the time. At the Trinity test, one scientist was asked by a colleague what he was going to do while watching the test, and he replied, "Well, I'm going to drink from my bottle of scotch." When asked what he would do if the test were a dud, he replied, "Well, that's why I'm going to bring two bottles of scotch."

Kamikaze pilots got so blitzed the night before their missions that they could hardly be thought of as functioning pilots when they got into their planes. The Russians, and the Nazis, mostly fought the entire war so fucked up on alcohol that many -- perhaps most -- major tactical decisions were made in a haze of drunkenness, and carried out in a haze of drunkenness.

The only person who can actually be exempted from this group is Hitler, but he was so juiced by his doctor on what to most of us would be an almost mind-numbing brew of depressants/stimulants/tranquilizers that it would be the equivalent of us injecting a hit of heroin upon waking up, followed by half a gram of coke, followed by a large dose of Valium, followed by a few snorts of meth . . . well, need I go on? Goering conducted almost his entire war smashed on morphine. To be a drunk -- which to me would mean consuming a quart or more of hard alcohol a day -- was so commonplace amongst the populations of all the nations -- Roosevelt "enjoyed his martinis," Churchill by all accounts woke up to several glasses of brandy before he even got out of bed -- and Stalin, well, 'nuff said.

So . . . this is not new news. Any kind of "temperance" movement is so doomed that I'm amazed at the monumental hypocrisy that underlies them. Richard Nixon was, by all accounts, fucked up beyond belief most nights. This was the leader of the Free World. Mao-tse-tung -- same story. Most of human history can be summed up by just one sentence: most of the movers and shakers were so fucked up most of the time that we can pretty much attribute all the events since the Pharaohs to have been conducted Under The Influence.

Now I think I will have another rum and coffee and take a couple of Dilaudid.
GilbertWham
kamakiri:
injecting a hit of heroin upon waking up, followed by half a gram of coke, followed by a large dose of Valium, followed by a few snorts of meth
Aaaaah, youth...

1Reply

robulus
robulus
If you give hash to male mice, they become horny and seek out females — but then they find “they can barely crawl over the females, let alone mount them,” so after a little while they yawn and start licking their own penises.
Aaaaah, youth...
Raita
Because it makes them feel good or funny?

The Sami (the ingenious people of Lapland) apparently used to feed Amanita muscaria -mushrooms to reindeer and then collect and drink their pee, because reindeer metabolizes the more poisonous components, leaving the "good stuff" in their pee. This is believed to have affected the image of flying reindeer in the myth of Father Christmas; the Sami people were high and thought the reindeer were flying through the air.

Source: http://h2g2.com/edited_entry/A60842181

The Santa Claus part is all a theory, of course. But it is known for sure that reindeer eat Amanita mushrooms. Why? Well, why not.
j9c1d
I thought that the Nazis were chemically propelled using amphetamine (which were consumed by Allied forces too) and morphine. And Pervitin (crystal meth).

I realize that the extent of my scholarship (Neal Stephenson novels,
the Daily Mail http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -METH.html
and Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphetamin ... nd_culture are not ideal first sources.
Quick--someone interview the last surviving WWII vets from all sides of the war before they die and take their secrets with them!
From Daily Mail story:
More than 200million pills were dolled out to the Wehrmacht and Luftwaffe between 1939 and 1945. German soldiers nicknamed it 'Panzerschokolade' - meaning 'tank chocolate'.

Image
Junkies: Even Hitler himself took intravenous methamphetamine

In Britain, newspapers reported how the enemy was using a 'miracle pill.' Even Hitler himself was given intravenous methamphetamine by his physician Theodor Morell.
[Now I understand, "High Hitler". I wonder if Hitler had ADD?]
Last edited by Milord on Fri Jan 23, 2015 2:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Milord
Expatriate
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 6:14 am
Reputation: 3
Location: Soon, Soon There
Canada

Re: Is Drug Taking a Natural Imperative?

Post by Milord »

It has just dawned on me that the

War on Drugs

is simply

Political Patronage.

Early soldiers were recruited to armies to rape and pillage as their just reward.

Royal Charters were issued to "legalize" piracy. As long as the Head of State got a share.

Opium Wars to Pay for Tea in England.

Air America run by CIA to transport Heroin to finance their Coupes. [Still happening.]

Around the World, Military and Police are given a Monopoly to Control Drugs to buy their Loyalty and subsidize their Budgets.
Sir_Quality_U_Feel
Expatriate
Posts: 1322
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 8:32 am
Reputation: 6

Re: Is Drug Taking a Natural Imperative?

Post by Sir_Quality_U_Feel »

.
I'll give ya 500 Riel for it...
User avatar
snookie BRO
Expatriate
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 6:47 pm
Reputation: 0
Solomon Islands

Re: Is Drug Taking a Natural Imperative?

Post by snookie BRO »

potty wrote:i rather believe, that drug-users have an underlying disease.

Bwa har har , ROTFL!!!

c'mon poo potty! Drug use is a far more complicated issue than this! Some people take drugs to self medicate against stressors-especially when they have little chance of escaping from them. Others may take them simply to enhance a pleasurable night out on the town- A pill to enhance music and tactile appreciation, or a smoke to relax after work.
Some individuals may even take them to get to know themselves and their place in the universe- A trip to the Amazon Or Gabon may be order of the day for them.

Then you've got the risk taking chancers, the Gamblers. Their brains are operating along the same dopamine/seratonin reward pathways as a cokehead!

It aint as simple as you seem to make it out because different drugs have different effects ranging from psychadelic, dissacociative, relaxant, hypnotic, euphorant, downer, deliriant, empathogen, to stimulant, etc etc....Some drugs have addictive profiles, some are not. And some drugs are even 'anti addictive'. It's also interesting that many of these drugs also are used in medical care, or even as medicines-(even though the fda state that they have no medical use whatsoever! What obvious lies and hippocrasy!)
potty wrote:yes, a compensation for some "physical deficits" ppl have. imo.

what do you think?

that everyone is a gambler by nature, and only "free will" stops us to gamble the house at the casino ?

A person can be addicted to any activity. It doesn't have to involve any drugs at all, since the brain already has the 'key' drugs of dopamine, seratonin, cannabinnoids, etc, in it. Hence why Gambling is so addictive to some people, because they have found an 'easy come, easy go rush'-that works the same neural pathways as coke does. Others may become addicted to pumped up feeling of Adrenaline and seek out adrenaline sports.

Yes, they may be compensating for something missing in their lives, even 'running away'. Or it might even be a healthy outlet that they have under control-wheter it be gotten by taking a drug, or by doing an activity.

And b4 anyone wants too poo poo drug taking as opposed to adrenalin sports, let's not forget that these selfish activities often lead to deaths of the doer-and others. A good example is mountain climbing


:dm:
Last edited by snookie BRO on Fri Jan 23, 2015 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rider of the storm.
User avatar
The Add Jay
Expatriate
Posts: 894
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 8:10 pm
Reputation: 4
Location: Nung river
Libya

Re: Is Drug Taking a Natural Imperative?

Post by The Add Jay »

I gotta say since moving to cambodia I drink but I dont ever get drunk and I havent smoked pot since moving here. I boiled it down to being happy with what Im doing. If you are generally a happy person(and getting laid) there is no need to be stimulated.

If I was to move back I would probably start drinking...dont think I would go back to pot.
You're a nobody in the gutter with a Smartphone in your a hand.


Ordinem ad Imperium
User avatar
frank lee bent
Expatriate
Posts: 11330
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 4:10 am
Reputation: 2094
United States of America

Re: Is Drug Taking a Natural Imperative?

Post by frank lee bent »

You all think too much.
User avatar
snookie BRO
Expatriate
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 6:47 pm
Reputation: 0
Solomon Islands

Re: Is Drug Taking a Natural Imperative?

Post by snookie BRO »

frank lee bent wrote:You all think too much.

Since i'm not all, i cannot think too much, thank god( :P )

Wharrever, got anything more constructive 2 say, bent?
Rider of the storm.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 732 guests