Baltimore....
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4193
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 8:05 pm
- Reputation: 17
Re: Baltimore....
RD... Try reading the article. A number of your bullet points are from you not actually understanding the information you've been given. Such as the difference between a legal homicide and an ME homicide. Or why people pass out/foam at the mouth from a submission hold (clue: its not because they can't breathe).
You've heard snippets and keywords and feel it enough to form an opinion even when you don't actually understand what you've been told.
You've heard snippets and keywords and feel it enough to form an opinion even when you don't actually understand what you've been told.
Re: Baltimore....
People can complain all they want, but they should really be putting forward solutions instead. How would they want the police to deal with someone who doesn't want arrested? When someone frees their arm, should they take the risk they are going for a weapon? Should we put criminals wellbeing before the wellbeing of the police?
- Username Taken
- Raven
- Posts: 13936
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 6:53 pm
- Reputation: 6005
Re: Baltimore....
Just a thought. What if they just took away all the weapons.UKJ wrote:take the risk they are going for a weapon?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4193
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 8:05 pm
- Reputation: 17
Re: Baltimore....
yeah, they should make them illegal so all of the law abiding criminals would stop having them.Username Taken wrote:Just a thought. What if they just took away all the weapons.UKJ wrote:take the risk they are going for a weapon?
- Username Taken
- Raven
- Posts: 13936
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 6:53 pm
- Reputation: 6005
Re: Baltimore....
Now you're talking.OrangeDragon wrote:yeah, they should make them illegal so all of the law abiding criminals would stop having them.Username Taken wrote:Just a thought. What if they just took away all the weapons.UKJ wrote:take the risk they are going for a weapon?
Re: Baltimore....
You can't take away knives.Username Taken wrote:Just a thought. What if they just took away all the weapons.UKJ wrote:take the risk they are going for a weapon?
- Username Taken
- Raven
- Posts: 13936
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 6:53 pm
- Reputation: 6005
Re: Baltimore....
Nor ball-point pens, apparently.UKJ wrote:You can't take away knives.Username Taken wrote:Just a thought. What if they just took away all the weapons.UKJ wrote:take the risk they are going for a weapon?
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 13458
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 11:37 pm
- Reputation: 3974
Re: Baltimore....
Hate to say this, but you've got a point there! sorry.Username Taken wrote:Nor ball-point pens, apparently.UKJ wrote:You can't take away knives.Username Taken wrote:Just a thought. What if they just took away all the weapons.UKJ wrote:take the risk they are going for a weapon?
(That was the little old lady on a plane if I remember - stabbed her seatmate because he snored. We shall have to board totally nude soon I guess.)
- The Add Jay
- Expatriate
- Posts: 894
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 8:10 pm
- Reputation: 4
- Location: Nung river
Re: Baltimore....
People can complain all they want, but they should really be putting forward solutions instead.UKJ wrote:People can complain all they want, but they should really be putting forward solutions instead. How would they want the police to deal with someone who doesn't want arrested? When someone frees their arm, should they take the risk they are going for a weapon? Should we put criminals wellbeing before the wellbeing of the police?
Cant...thats called being raciest if you purpose actual solutions
You're a nobody in the gutter with a Smartphone in your a hand.
Ordinem ad Imperium
Ordinem ad Imperium
Re: Baltimore....
I have actually followed this case quite closely and understand the specifics of it. Silly deflections about why people foam at the mouth do nothing except try to draw attention away from the facts of the case:OrangeDragon wrote:RD... Try reading the article. A number of your bullet points are from you not actually understanding the information you've been given. Such as the difference between a legal homicide and an ME homicide. Or why people pass out/foam at the mouth from a submission hold (clue: its not because they can't breathe).
You've heard snippets and keywords and feel it enough to form an opinion even when you don't actually understand what you've been told.
Again A) There is zero evidence the guy was a threat to anyone. B) A banned and deadly choke hold was applied to him. C) Four Cops piled on to him. D) He died due to this unprovoked attack on him E) The death was ruled a homicide F) He walked away with no disciplinary action.
I really cannot imagine anyone other than a cop who thinks cops can do no wrong, or a lawyer representing him, that could support the cop in this case --- it is so much more clear cut than some other cases like Ferguson.
Anyway you are entitled to your POV, and rather than continue to deal with so many of your deflections aimed at distracting from the basic facts in this case I think best we just agree to disagree.
Cheers,
RD
Taxi, we'd rather walk. Huddle a doorway with the rain dogs
The Rum pours strong and thin. Beat out the dustman with the Rain Dogs;
The Rum pours strong and thin. Beat out the dustman with the Rain Dogs;
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: barang_TK, Bluenose, crackheadyo, ExPenhMan, Fourkinnel, John Bingham, Majestic-12 [Bot], Province, ressl, Semrush [Bot], Soriya, Tywin and 459 guests