God bless Murika.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-43715680
Children's Commissioner criticises Amazon over Child Sex Dolls
By Patrick EvansBBC News
• 12 April 2018
• Share this with Facebook

• Share this with Twitter

• Share this with Messenger

• Share this with Email

• Share
child sex doll was removed by Amazon but was back on the website days later
England's Children's Commissioner says Amazon should ensure "disgusting" child sex dolls are not restored for sale on its website, after a BBC investigation found them for sale on its platform.
About a dozen child sex dolls were found for sale on Amazon Marketplace.
After the BBC contacted Amazon about one doll it was removed, but three days later it was back on the website.
Amazon said it had now removed all the specific products which the BBC drew to its attention.
In a statement Amazon said: "All Marketplace sellers must follow our selling guidelines and those who don't will be subject to action including potential removal of their account. The products in question are no longer available."
, Children's Commissioner for England, said the dolls were a 'clear danger'
Responding to the BBC investigation, Anne Longfield, England Children's Commissioner, said: "These dolls are disgusting and are clearly meant to look like children.
"Not only do I, as Children's Commissioner, but the wider public also, have a right to expect a huge company like Amazon, to not only remove these products from their platform, but to explain why they are on there in the first place and ensure they can't just be reloaded having been taken down.
"Such dolls are clearly built for one purpose and that purpose is a clear danger to the safety of real children," she added.
Legal loophole
The UK Border Force has seized 179 child-like sex dolls since March 2016 as part of Operation Shiraz, a special operation set up in conjunction with the National Crime Agency.
In July 2017, a judge ruled child sex dolls were obscene items and therefore covered by the 1979 Customs and Excise Management Act.
However, it is not a criminal offence to manufacture or possess a child sex doll: individuals can only be charged for importing them.
 The 'new phenomenon' of child sex dolls
 Child sex doll an obscene item, judge rules
 Ex-school governor who imported child sex doll is jailed
Amazon Marketplace is an area of the retailing website where third party businesses can sell products.
Amazon does not sell the products itself but instead receives money from the sellers.
Dolls found on the website were typically three or four feet tall with waist sizes around 16 inches (41cm).
In the accompanying pictures they were placed in sexual poses with descriptions such as "Mannequin Sexy" and "100% mimics girl's body".
Several dolls were described as coming with "sexy lingerie".
A couple from Durham were horrified to find that a child sex doll came up in the results for their online search for sex toys.
"We felt disgusted and we straight away reported it to Amazon," they told the BBC.
Twenty four hours later the couple had received no response from the retailer.
NSPCC warning
The NSPCC has warned use of the dolls can lead people to harm children.
Designed to be as lifelike as possible, they are made of a silicone type material and weigh as much as a child.
The dolls are made in such a way as to enable sex acts to be performed on them.
The head of policy at the children's charity NSPCC, Almudena Lara, highlighted the danger child sex dolls can pose to children.
She told the BBC: "We already know that there is a risk that people using these dolls could become desensitised and their behaviour could become normalised to them, so that they go on to harm children, as is often the case with those who view indecent images of children online.
"There is absolutely no evidence that using the dolls stops potential abusers from abusing children.
"Until gaps in the law are addressed to make it illegal to make, sell or distribute them, retailers like Amazon should refuse to sell these vile dolls," she said.

They should just track who they are sold to, put those people on a pedo list and keep track of them. Or, if they can get a warrant based on the sale(doubtful) I'm sure most of them have some form of child porn as it seems most pedos usually do.

how does the law define a doll as a child.

Gardiguy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:52 am They should just track who they are sold to, put those people on a pedo list and keep track of them. Or, if they can get a warrant based on the sale(doubtful) I'm sure most of them have some form of child porn as it seems most pedos usually do.

easy to track thru cc, easy for law enforcement to get warrants for said records
Problem? Not enough man power to track them,

There is a risk that people using these dolls could become desensitised ... (and) go on to harm children, as is often the case with those who view indecent images of children online," said Almudena Lara, NSPCC's head of policy and public affairs.

Comments
"There is absolutely no evidence that using the dolls stops potential abusers from abusing children," she added.

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/child-s ... uk-1836879
this is NOT NEW:

from 2014 in Australia

Paedophiles are importing life-like child sex dolls – and the law can do nothing

https://www.mamamia.com.au/paedophiles- ... sex-dolls/

WTF????
2016

A Japanese company is manufacturing life-like child sex dolls, marketed specifically for paedophiles who want to control their sexual impulses.

The designer Shin Takagi says the anatomically-correct sex dolls, representing girls as young as five, have been shipped to clients around the world for more than a decade.

http://yournewswire.com/japanese-compan ... edophiles/

markd wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 12:15 pm how does the law define a doll as a child.

Buy one and find out.

Just for arguments sake. So it’s better for someone to be actually kidnapping and raping little kids then to be playing with dolls?

The point is that the dolls may, in fact, aggravate the problem.

This may be a revolutionary suggestion, but try reading the entire article.

if yu try to search child porn images on the web you get the pope & mostly other assorted images
if you search child sex dolls you get every image is of just that
they should also be classed as obscene

markd wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 5:03 pm if yu try to search child porn images on the web you get the pope & mostly other assorted images
if you search child sex dolls you get every image is of just that
they should also be classed as obscene

"""????WHAT
here is duck duck go for "child sex dolls" I see NO IMAGES of such unless there in a news report
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=child+sex+dol ... 6-6&ia=web

What I dont get is why this has been going on for years ( as my quotes above- back to 2014) yet only now such an outrage>>>
and here back to 2013.

A man who makes child-like dolls for paedophiles has said that he is an artist after his creations were seized by border officials.
Since 2013, 18 crates of the horrifyingly life-like sex dolls were confiscated by border control officials in Australia.
Shin Takagi, who created them and admits he’s a paedophile, told Fairfax Media: I am an artist.’

http://metro.co.uk/2016/08/16/paedophil ... n-6070145/

It's not a crime to fuck a doll, whatever it looks like. Oh noes, they're abusing an unfeeling, emotionless rubber and metal simulacrum of a child, won't someone think of the robot children.