UKJ wrote:

MekongMouse wrote:

UKJ wrote:

MekongMouse wrote:I think anti-feminist men spend a lot more time thinking about feminist sex lives than vice versa.

We weren't talking sex lives. Do keep up. If anyone is at fault here, it's the women ( I called them feminists) who put mens opinions in a negative light, as proven by Giblet. I posted that I had had enough of drunken British women, which is fair enough. I have had enough of drunk Brit men as well, but I don't want to have kids with them!!, so that was irrelevant. But thanks to Giblet for a fine example, of painting mens preferences as negative. And yourself for making shit up.

I'm caught up. Who you choose to date or marry is your sex life. I'm saying feminists aren't thinking, "gee, I wonder why that charming bloke who is always visiting SE Asia is interested in asian women instead of me?" They probably don't give two shits about you. Feminist women tend to like... shocking, wait for it, feminist men! Or at least those receptive to feminist ideals. This is the same way feminist men tend to like feminist women (of any ethnicity).

And I've never seen giblet post anything anti-male, so not sure what you're on about.

Lol fest
So you know what feminist women think? How utterly sexist.

The reason I say western women give a shit is............because they say so

Listen - I have always been attracted to strong women, from single mothers, a woman who ran my business, to others. But, I was talking drunks, a lack of femininity, and being fat uncouth louts. It's you and Gibs problem if you both want to go off on an imaginary negative direction.

I have an understanding of what feminism is because I am a feminist and I know feminists and have read feminist works. I don't know what every individual feminist thinks because it is a broad category, with much debate and disagreement. But yes, I am completely confident that feminist women aren't interested in misogynists. If that makes me a sexist in your eyes, perhaps you're defining the word incorrectly.

MekongMouse wrote: But yes, I am completely confident that feminist women aren't interested in misogynists.

You give feminism a bad name. You started off on an imaginary negative avenue, won't address any issues. But just make personal, unfounded insults.

I am completely confident, if you would like to wager $5k, that I can get several strong feminist western ex girlfriends and employees, who will back up that I have never been a misogynist. I probably have more female friends than male. Although that may be because I employed over 20 women at any time.

What does preferring women employees over men say?............. Come on. Let's hear your negative slant!

UKJ wrote:

MekongMouse wrote: But yes, I am completely confident that feminist women aren't interested in misogynists.

You give feminism a bad name. You started off on an imaginary negative avenue, won't address any issues. But just make personal, unfounded insults.

I am completely confident, if you would like to wager $5k, that I can get several strong feminist western ex girlfriends and employees, who will back up that I have never been a misogynist. I probably have more female friends than male. Although that may be because I employed over 20 women at any time.

What does preferring women employees over men say?............. Come on. Let's hear your negative slant!

Nah, I'm good. I prefer more stimulating debate than this.

MekongMouse wrote:

UKJ wrote:

MekongMouse wrote: But yes, I am completely confident that feminist women aren't interested in misogynists.

You give feminism a bad name. You started off on an imaginary negative avenue, won't address any issues. But just make personal, unfounded insults.

I am completely confident, if you would like to wager $5k, that I can get several strong feminist western ex girlfriends and employees, who will back up that I have never been a misogynist. I probably have more female friends than male. Although that may be because I employed over 20 women at any time.

What does preferring women employees over men say?............. Come on. Let's hear your negative slant!

Nah, I'm good. I prefer more stimulating debate than this.

You mean you name call, then run away, as you can't back up your embarrassment to feminism baseless rant. Just as I thought. Another offensive mouthy troll.

May I invite MM and Giblet to a thread I started a while ago, about women only female shortlists? I am genuinely interested in international women's views on this, even though none of you will declare the country they grew up in.

https://cambodiaexpatsonline.com/post32736.html#p32736

No, thanks. Debating with you isn't fun; your representation of what I said and what I think is completely warped.

p.s. the word you were looking for is misandrist.

giblet wrote:

UKJ wrote: .............And feminists wonder why we prefer Asian women!

I'd bet that a feminist has never looked at you and wondered that, to be honest.

giblet wrote:No, thanks. Debating with you isn't fun; your representation of what I said and what I think is completely warped.

p.s. the word you were looking for is misandrist.

Misandrist lol - You seem to always assume everyone hates. Maybe you do, but I don't blanket hate. Someone has to attack me to be hated, as I just posted about the K440 jesters.

Coming in with a personal insult, will always make an exchange go south. If you want a debate to be fun, don't wade in with an insult. It's basic common sense and courtesy.

I remember you previously criticized Scotland's immigration policy and minimum wage. You are quite an opinionated and critical little troll, for someone who won't declare where they are from, and therefore I couldn't compare your homeland's policy. I guess that describes you. You can dish it out, but won't let anyone respond, or you leave with an insult. You remind me of AiA. Goodbye. I hope you are a troll of your word.

Can we all stop labelling anyone who disagrees with us a troll?

Can wannabe mods stop trolling for arguments, by sticking their nose into other people's exchanges, with their unwarranted and false representation of the exchange, just so they can keep a finished argument going! They have done this before, and it's textbook trolling.
1. Find a disagreement that has, mercifully, finished.
2. Try to keep it going, despite it being a thread you weren't interested in, apart from posting a smiley, like a nodding imbecile, just to agree with an out of order insult.
3. When the smiley didn't work. Stick your big nose in later, and try to keep it going.

Real mods - Maybe you could close this as it's ran it's course, except for attracting people looking for arguments, and I think SD might have relapsed into baiting me for arguments again.