vladimir wrote:Permabans were for people who consistently got banned and didn't respond positively, iow do what admin wanted.

I argued against almost every ban because in most cases, some arse-creeper started shit with me then when I responded he relied on buddies in admin.

I received more than one PM where the sender agreed that the mod had been too harsh on me, and several times bans were shortened/overturned, gavinmac can testify to the latter.

Normally when you get banned, you get a PM saying when you are banned until. My last banning did not state for how long, so I assumed it was permanent, but some people have said it's not.

It's kind of moot, because I have records of a phone/email conversation argument between scobienz and myself wherein we both basically told each other to fuck off. It's also moot because I feel logos/ttm has gone power-crazy, Detroit muscle and even his friends agreed on occasion. TTM sent me a PM telling me to get a fucking life and asking me if I knew how many people were very angry with me. He then threatened me with immediate, long banning if I ever questioned his modding again.

So scobienz supported the ban, TTM banned me, no one else objected, but you're saying I'm protected? Who's still posting there, me or the dwarves? And if I'm not perma-banned, why am I not there, since it's so pampered? I get no special treatment here, except the stalking you do on orders from 440, imo.

I think you're a little schizo, because you imply that you were perma-banned, but every post of yours indicates you support them 110%. Do you see my posts reflecting that? Unequivocally, no.

Your argument is silly, really.

In addition, what was your 440 moniker, and why were you banned? For someone who claims to be in the same boat as me, you sure come across as not being in the boat.

Now please get over your unrequited hard-on for me, and get on with your life.

I really think your argument re me being protected is kind of self-defeating, a child can see it's bollocks.

My support for workers has never been anything but genuine, in fact I've been labelled all sorts of things, usually derogatory, because I dare to call for regulation of unfettered capitalism.

Username Taken wrote:

UKJ wrote: . . . yet you never got perma banned, like many of us on here . . .

Did you get perma banned?
Are you not the same UKJ that still posts over there?

vladimir wrote:Permabans were for people who consistently got banned and didn't respond positively, iow do what admin wanted.

I argued against almost every ban because in most cases, some arse-creeper started shit with me then when I responded he relied on buddies in admin.

I received more than one PM where the sender agreed that the mod had been too harsh on me, and several times bans were shortened/overturned, gavinmac can testify to the latter.

Normally when you get banned, you get a PM saying when you are banned until. My last banning did not state for how long, so I assumed it was permanent, but some people have said it's not.

Samouth wrote:This thread is too long to read to understand more about khmer 440. However i am wondering if this is true, at khmer 440 every threads involving local/khmer, posters tend to look down us?