OrangeDragon wrote:

Milord wrote:
edit: OD, Shirley if we can forgive KiR and give back his voice, we can forgive Joon. She has an interesting perspective although somewhat defensive at times. (which is understandable)

Absolutely... I just don't think she can claim being victimised for being a mod. Even in the links she just posted, those people were having a go at her BEFORE her mod status as well, the green name just gave them something more to target her for.

I didn't claim that I'm being "victimised for being a mod." It's you who said that my posting style changed after becoming a mod.
And I'm showing you that I was posting as a regular poster, until people attacked me and made snide remarks for being a mod.

Joon wrote:

StroppyChops wrote:

Joon wrote:yadda yadda

Joon, I personally enjoy your posts but recently you appear here with your K440 mod hat on to "tell it like it is" - and when that's your ONLY participation here, that's uncool. You're the comment cop over there - how about being a private citizen over here and either participating, or not.

I would if I wasn't being followed around by people here telling me to fuck off.

Sounds a lot like you are.

And what you've shown is how to control a narrative by choosing its starting location.

OrangeDragon wrote:Like when her first post in a restricted access section, which she didn't ask entry into until after she'd been made a mod elsewhere, was to ask for a list of it's members. Can't help but find that a little suspicious.

Agreed.

Stroppy, the real culprit who takes enjoy mocking you there is AndyinAsia.

I'm not getting those mellow vibes I was talking about.

What's the point in reliving the bad old days?

This site is renowned for its peacekeeper ways.

flying chicken wrote:Stroppy, the real culprit who takes enjoy mocking you there is AndyinAsia.

I was planning on putting Andy into one of my infamous Auto-Generated stories called "Arse Man Confronted" but didn't want to offend Jessy, so it's on the backburner for the moment.

Lol @ Joon for trying to bait me into her little battle.

Not today precious.

Joon,

I'm sorry that you feel attacked and harrassed. I cannot defend those actions and I hope that I have never made you felt that way.

However. You can't really delete posts and then say it's because the poster is naughty if the posts themselves had nothing naughty in them. If somebody is so naughty that you decide to delete their future posts then use that ban hammer.

In this case the naughty guy was allowed to stay, and then you deleted his posts where he asked a monk about Buddha. I can't wrap my head around this, it is not rational at all. I think what you mention as problems are not only making you stressed and uncomfortable but also blind to logic.

General Chatter has PMed me what he wrote you himself, some garbage about family trees and babboons and so on. If that was not in the monk thread then I don't understand why you would delete his posts in the monk thread if they didn't contain anything else nasty.

Please moderate posts and threads, not people and feelings.

wasabi wrote:

Joon wrote:

StroppyChops wrote:

Joon wrote:yadda yadda[/quo
I can see the same thing happening here again - the "olive branch" was extended to KIR by some of his most vocal critics, yet King Twatflannel (I'm not outing him as I don't think Francis has changed his handle as yet (I'll get more negs from him I'm sure - bring it on ), and takeoman and a couple of others can't let go. And in this thread, GC and takeoman are showing the same level of vindictiveness toward Scoby/Bendix

Perhaps you might like to quote some of the comments I've made about Scoby/Bendix on this thread, as I can't remember making any reference to him. As regards KiR, just as I did on 440, if I feel he is distorting the truth, or trying to demean others by revealing what should be private matters I'll call him on it. You may consider him a special case, I don't.