USA fires 50 Tomahawk missiles into Syria
- Jamie_Lambo
- The Cool Boxing Guy
- Posts: 15039
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:34 am
- Reputation: 3132
- Location: ลพบุรี
Re: USA fires 50 Tomahawk missiles into Syria
Zero and zero is nothing but zero
Cancer and people conspire together
Running and running and going forever
Collected and sampled, starving for zero
Minus the inside and minus the circle
Inhabit the riddle and fill in the hovel
Wherein and herein, between us and near us
Zero and zero is nothing but zero
Mean Dtuk Mean Trei, Mean Loy Mean Srey
Punchy McShortstacks School of Hard Knocks
Punchy McShortstacks School of Hard Knocks
Re: USA fires 50 Tomahawk missiles into Syria
Or more shortly expressed, "nothing is something inside out."
- frank lee bent
- Expatriate
- Posts: 11330
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 4:10 am
- Reputation: 2094
Re: USA fires 50 Tomahawk missiles into Syria
Mr Trump is doing what he said he would do.
He is going to cut the gordian knot of the two Koreas, and force Russia to decide to maintain the status quo or opt for change.
In case anyone wonders, I am not a fan.
Look how old the Korean war is.
China will also have to decide.
Trump is fully capable of using nukes.
He is going to cut the gordian knot of the two Koreas, and force Russia to decide to maintain the status quo or opt for change.
In case anyone wonders, I am not a fan.
Look how old the Korean war is.
China will also have to decide.
Trump is fully capable of using nukes.
Re: USA fires 50 Tomahawk missiles into Syria
Yes he is, and he is one of few to do so.frank lee bent wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2017 6:05 pm Mr Trump is doing what he said he would do.
He is going to cut the gordian knot of the two Koreas, and force Russia to decide to maintain the status quo or opt for change.
In case anyone wonders, I am not a fan.
Look how old the Korean war is.
China will also have to decide.
Trump is fully capable of using nukes.
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 3858
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 7:49 am
- Reputation: 978
- Location: Outside of Kampong Cham city
Re: USA fires 50 Tomahawk missiles into Syria
"Yes he is, and he is one of few to do so." I wonder if you were S. Korean if you would have so much gungho nationalism. Causing a country to be vaporized is a heavy price to pay for"victory." The US would have little to lose except for military personnel and civilians currently living there. And yes he is "one of the few, " in fact there was only one other. So with good reason one first pursues a more prudent course of action.
As my old Cajun bait seller used to say, "I opes you luck.
- phuketrichard
- Expatriate
- Posts: 16870
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 5:17 pm
- Reputation: 5775
- Location: Atlantis
Re: USA fires 50 Tomahawk missiles into Syria
and a few days ago a suicide bomber killed over 120 CIVILIANS ( more than 1/2 children) in Syria and no one mentions it.
IF there was not oil in the middle east u think anyone would give a fuck??
I am with krutz
"drop the bomb, exterminate them all"
IF there was not oil in the middle east u think anyone would give a fuck??
I am with krutz
"drop the bomb, exterminate them all"
In a nation run by swine, all pigs are upward-mobile and the rest of us are fucked until we can put our acts together: not necessarily to win, but mainly to keep from losing completely. HST
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 3858
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 7:49 am
- Reputation: 978
- Location: Outside of Kampong Cham city
Re: USA fires 50 Tomahawk missiles into Syria
I believe you mean Colonel Kurtz. A good way to lose completely.
As my old Cajun bait seller used to say, "I opes you luck.
Re: USA fires 50 Tomahawk missiles into Syria
"in fact there is only one other"? Is the source for this fact the media? Agree, the US has little to lose with this one, as most other conflicts they started. All abroad off course. Nationalism does probably apply the least to me amongst all posters here. Its complex, and I won't elaborate. Maybe to get my point across I should have said : 'Yes he is, so are others'. I am not a teacher and try to do my best with this language.taabarang wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:25 pm "Yes he is, and he is one of few to do so." I wonder if you were S. Korean if you would have so much gungho nationalism. Causing a country to be vaporized is a heavy price to pay for"victory." The US would have little to lose except for military personnel and civilians currently living there. And yes he is "one of the few, " in fact there was only one other. So with good reason one first pursues a more prudent course of action.
Not sure yet, but I think we are on the same page here.
Re: USA fires 50 Tomahawk missiles into Syria
I had a friend that fought there in 1950, and like my father who fought at Kohima in 1945, the battle at chosin was an epic and often forgot battle:frank lee bent wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2017 6:05 pm Mr Trump is doing what he said he would do.
He is going to cut the gordian knot of the two Koreas, and force Russia to decide to maintain the status quo or opt for change.
In case anyone wonders, I am not a fan.
Look how old the Korean war is.
China will also have to decide.
Trump is fully capable of using nukes.
"In the winter of 1950, 15,000 U.S. Soldiers and Marines were surrounded and trapped by an overwhelming force of communist Chinese soldiers in the frozen mountains of North Korea. Facing impossible odds, the men fought 78 miles to freedom and saved the lives of 98,000 civilian refugees."
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 39 Replies
- 10189 Views
-
Last post by Shazza
-
- 33 Replies
- 3718 Views
-
Last post by mannanman
-
- 0 Replies
- 655 Views
-
Last post by yong
-
- 15 Replies
- 3855 Views
-
Last post by Brody
-
- 0 Replies
- 858 Views
-
Last post by CEOCambodiaNews
-
- 0 Replies
- 880 Views
-
Last post by CEOCambodiaNews
-
- 4 Replies
- 1728 Views
-
Last post by nemo
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ali baba, Amazon [Bot], Whatsupdoc and 289 guests